2008 Nissan Micra vs. 1960 Peugeot 203

To start off, 2008 Nissan Micra is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Peugeot 203. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Peugeot 203 would be higher. At 1,461 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan Micra (88 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1960 Peugeot 203. (44 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1960 Peugeot 203. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Micra weights approximately 10 kg more than 1960 Peugeot 203. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1960 Peugeot 203 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Peugeot 203. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Micra (185 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Peugeot 203. (77 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Peugeot 203.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Nissan Micra 1960 Peugeot 203
Make Nissan Peugeot
Model Micra 203
Year Released 2008 1960
Body Type Hatchback Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1461 cc 1286 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 88 HP 44 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 185 Nm 77 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 76 mm 75 mm
Engine Stroke Size 80.5 mm 73 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 18.8:1 9.4:1
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 990 kg 980 kg
Vehicle Length 5260 mm 4360 mm
Vehicle Width 1550 mm 1620 mm
Vehicle Height 1670 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 2580 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 46 L 50 L