2008 Nissan Micra vs. 2000 Proton 300
To start off, 2008 Nissan Micra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Proton 300 would be higher. At 1,386 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan Micra (87 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2000 Proton 300. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 2000 Proton 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Proton 300 weights approximately 39 kg more than 2008 Nissan Micra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Micra (128 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Proton 300. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Proton 300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Nissan Micra | 2000 Proton 300 | |
| Make | Nissan | Proton |
| Model | Micra | 300 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1386 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 75 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 996 kg | 1035 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2450 mm |
