2008 Nissan Micra vs. 2002 Renault Grand Espace
To start off, 2008 Nissan Micra is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Renault Grand Espace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Renault Grand Espace would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Renault Grand Espace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Renault Grand Espace (162 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2008 Nissan Micra. (64 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Renault Grand Espace should accelerate faster than 2008 Nissan Micra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Renault Grand Espace weights approximately 722 kg more than 2008 Nissan Micra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Renault Grand Espace (250 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Micra. (110 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2002 Renault Grand Espace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Micra. 2002 Renault Grand Espace has automatic transmission and 2008 Nissan Micra has manual transmission. 2008 Nissan Micra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Renault Grand Espace will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Nissan Micra | 2002 Renault Grand Espace | |
| Make | Nissan | Renault |
| Model | Micra | Grand Espace |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1240 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 162 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 250 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 82.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78.3 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Top Speed | 154 km/hour | 197 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 16.3 seconds | 10.8 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1043 kg | 1765 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3720 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2810 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.9 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 83 L |
