2008 Nissan Micra vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Nissan Micra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Nissan Micra would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2008 Nissan Micra. (87 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2008 Nissan Micra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Micra. (128 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Nissan Micra | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Micra | E-350 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1386 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 3720 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 46 L | 57 L |