2008 Nissan Murano vs. 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2008 Nissan Murano is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 230 kg more than 2008 Nissan Murano.
Because 2008 Nissan Murano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Murano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Nissan Murano | 1964 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
| Make | Nissan | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Murano | Silver Cloud |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1964 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3498 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 231 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 200 km/hour | 187 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1870 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.3 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 81 L |
