2008 Nissan Murano vs. 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2008 Nissan Murano is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 284 kg more than 2008 Nissan Murano.
Because 2008 Nissan Murano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Murano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Nissan Murano | 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | Nissan | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Murano | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 2008 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 231 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 95.5 mm | 104.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 99.1 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 200 km/hour | 190 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1870 kg | 2154 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3060 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.3 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 107 L |