2008 Nissan Murano vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Profile
To start off, 2008 Nissan Murano is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile Profile would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Profile is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan Murano (231 HP) has 25 more horse power than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. (206 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Murano weights approximately 310 kg more than 2000 Oldsmobile Profile. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile Profile (353 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Murano. (319 Nm). This means 2000 Oldsmobile Profile will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Murano.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Nissan Murano | 2000 Oldsmobile Profile | |
| Make | Nissan | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Murano | Profile |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3498 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 231 HP | 206 HP |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1870 kg | 1560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2880 mm |
