2008 Nissan Rogue vs. 1983 Skoda Rapid R
To start off, 2008 Nissan Rogue is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Skoda Rapid R. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Skoda Rapid R would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan Rogue (170 HP) has 108 more horse power than 1983 Skoda Rapid R. (62 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1983 Skoda Rapid R. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 262 kg more than 1983 Skoda Rapid R. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1983 Skoda Rapid R is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Skoda Rapid R. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Rogue, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Skoda Rapid R. (99 Nm). This means 2008 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Skoda Rapid R. 2008 Nissan Rogue has automatic transmission and 1983 Skoda Rapid R has manual transmission. 1983 Skoda Rapid R will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Nissan Rogue will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Nissan Rogue | 1983 Skoda Rapid R | |
Make | Nissan | Skoda |
Model | Rogue | Rapid R |
Year Released | 2008 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 62 HP |
Torque | 237 Nm | 99 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 75.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 72 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1112 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 47 L |