2008 Nissan Rogue vs. 1990 Ford Telstar
To start off, 2008 Nissan Rogue is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan Rogue (170 HP) has 76 more horse power than 1990 Ford Telstar. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Telstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 82 kg more than 1990 Ford Telstar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Ford Telstar. (158 Nm). This means 2008 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Ford Telstar.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Nissan Rogue | 1990 Ford Telstar | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Rogue | Telstar |
Year Released | 2008 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 94 HP |
Torque | 237 Nm | 158 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1112 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2520 mm |