2008 Nissan Rogue vs. 1995 Pontiac Firehawk
To start off, 2008 Nissan Rogue is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Pontiac Firehawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Pontiac Firehawk would be higher. At 5,735 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Pontiac Firehawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 724 kg more than 1995 Pontiac Firehawk.
Because 2008 Nissan Rogue is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Pontiac Firehawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Rogue will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Pontiac Firehawk (464 Nm) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Rogue. (237 Nm). This means 1995 Pontiac Firehawk will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Rogue.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Nissan Rogue | 1995 Pontiac Firehawk | |
| Make | Nissan | Pontiac |
| Model | Rogue | Firehawk |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1995 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2486 cc | 5735 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 464 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2405 kg | 1681 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2600 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 54 L |
