2008 Nissan Rogue vs. 1996 Tata E220
To start off, 2008 Nissan Rogue is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Tata E220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Tata E220 would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan Rogue (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1996 Tata E220. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1996 Tata E220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Tata E220 weights approximately 240 kg more than 2008 Nissan Rogue.
Because 2008 Nissan Rogue is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Tata E220. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Rogue will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Tata E220. (210 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Tata E220.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Nissan Rogue | 1996 Tata E220 | |
Make | Nissan | Tata |
Model | Rogue | E220 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2488 cc | 2197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 237 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2810 mm |