2008 Nissan Rogue vs. 2010 Scion tC
To start off, 2010 Scion tC is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Nissan Rogue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Nissan Rogue would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan Rogue (170 HP) has 9 more horse power than 2010 Scion tC. (161 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 2010 Scion tC.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Scion tC. (219 Nm). This means 2008 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Scion tC.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Nissan Rogue | 2010 Scion tC | |
Make | Nissan | Scion |
Model | Rogue | tC |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Body Type | Crossover | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2500 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 237 Nm | 219 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1415 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.1 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 55 L |