2008 Nissan Rogue vs. 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo
To start off, 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Nissan Rogue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Nissan Rogue would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo weights approximately 872 kg more than 2008 Nissan Rogue.
Because 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Rogue, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo (489 Nm) has 252 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Rogue. (237 Nm). This means 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Rogue.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Nissan Rogue | 2013 Maserati Gran Turismo | |
| Make | Nissan | Maserati |
| Model | Rogue | Gran Turismo |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 489 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 84 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1112 kg | 1984 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4881 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2056 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1353 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2942 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 9.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 75 L |
