2008 Nissan Rogue vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Nissan Rogue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Nissan Rogue would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 1150 kg more than 2013 Mini Roadster.
Because 2008 Nissan Rogue is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mini Roadster. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Rogue will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Roadster (279 Nm @ 5100 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Rogue. (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Rogue.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Nissan Rogue | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
| Make | Nissan | Mini |
| Model | Rogue | Roadster |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 237 Nm | 279 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2405 kg | 1255 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 3758 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1892 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1391 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2467 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.1 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 8.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 50 L |
