2008 Nissan Titan vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Nissan Titan is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 5,552 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan Titan (317 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (195 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan Titan (522 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Nissan Titan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Nissan Titan | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Nissan | Jeep |
| Model | Titan | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5552 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 195 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4900 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque | 522 Nm | 312 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5710 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3560 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 14 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 19.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 17 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 78 L |
