2008 Nissan Versa vs. 1956 Riley RM A
To start off, 2008 Nissan Versa is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan Versa is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Versa weights approximately 1170 kg more than 1956 Riley RM A.
Because 1956 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Versa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Nissan Versa | 1956 Riley RM A | |
Make | Nissan | Riley |
Model | Versa | RM A |
Year Released | 2008 | 1956 |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 122 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2405 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2870 mm |