2008 Nissan X-Trail vs. 1951 Singer SM 1500
To start off, 2008 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Singer SM 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Singer SM 1500 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (169 HP) has 122 more horse power than 1951 Singer SM 1500. (47 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1951 Singer SM 1500.
Because 2008 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Singer SM 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (316 Nm) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Singer SM 1500. (98 Nm). This means 2008 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Singer SM 1500.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Nissan X-Trail | 1951 Singer SM 1500 | |
Make | Nissan | Singer |
Model | X-Trail | SM 1500 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 47 HP |
Torque | 316 Nm | 98 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2320 mm |