2008 Nissan X-Trail vs. 1964 Seat 1500
To start off, 2008 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (134 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1964 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1964 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 440 kg more than 1964 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Seat 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Nissan X-Trail | 1964 Seat 1500 | |
| Make | Nissan | Seat |
| Model | X-Trail | 1500 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2184 cc | 1481 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2660 mm |
