2008 Nissan X-Trail vs. 1972 Plymouth Barracuda
To start off, 2008 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Plymouth Barracuda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Plymouth Barracuda would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Plymouth Barracuda is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Plymouth Barracuda weights approximately 16 kg more than 2008 Nissan X-Trail.
Because 2008 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Plymouth Barracuda. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Plymouth Barracuda (251 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan X-Trail. (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1972 Plymouth Barracuda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Nissan X-Trail | 1972 Plymouth Barracuda | |
| Make | Nissan | Plymouth |
| Model | X-Trail | Barracuda |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2486 cc | 3687 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 110 HP |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 86.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 104.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.4:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1394 kg | 1410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2760 mm |
