2008 Nissan X-Trail vs. 1972 Steyr 126
To start off, 2008 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Steyr 126. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Steyr 126 would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (134 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1972 Steyr 126. (24 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1972 Steyr 126. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 1015 kg more than 1972 Steyr 126. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Steyr 126. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Nissan X-Trail | 1972 Steyr 126 | |
| Make | Nissan | Steyr |
| Model | X-Trail | 126 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1972 |
| Engine Size | 2184 cc | 643 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 585 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1380 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 1850 mm |
