2008 Nissan X-Trail vs. 1992 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2008 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Toyota Camry. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Toyota Camry would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (169 HP) has 63 more horse power than 1992 Toyota Camry. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1992 Toyota Camry.
Because 2008 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Toyota Camry. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (316 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Toyota Camry. (285 Nm). This means 2008 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Nissan X-Trail | 1992 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | X-Trail | Camry |
Year Released | 2008 | 1992 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 316 Nm | 285 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4650 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 70 L |