2008 Nissan X-Trail vs. 1993 Rover 200
To start off, 2008 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Rover 200 would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (134 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1993 Rover 200. (86 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1993 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 430 kg more than 1993 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (300 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Rover 200. (180 Nm). This means 2008 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Nissan X-Trail | 1993 Rover 200 | |
Make | Nissan | Rover |
Model | X-Trail | 200 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2184 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 180 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 80.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1410 mm |