2008 Nissan X-Trail vs. 1995 Rover 400
To start off, 2008 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 400 would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (134 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1995 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 400.
Because 2008 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Rover 400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (300 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Nissan X-Trail | 1995 Rover 400 | |
Make | Nissan | Rover |
Model | X-Trail | 400 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2184 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 16.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2560 mm |