2008 Nissan X-Trail vs. 2009 Acura CSX
To start off, 2009 Acura CSX is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 63 more horse power than 2008 Nissan X-Trail. (134 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 2008 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 287 kg more than 2009 Acura CSX.
Because 2008 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Acura CSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Nissan X-Trail | 2009 Acura CSX | |
Make | Nissan | Acura |
Model | X-Trail | CSX |
Year Released | 2008 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2184 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2700 mm |