2008 Nissan X-Trail vs. 2012 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (154 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2008 Nissan X-Trail. (134 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser should accelerate faster than 2008 Nissan X-Trail.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Citroen C-Crosser (380 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan X-Trail. (300 Nm). This means 2012 Citroen C-Crosser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Nissan X-Trail | 2012 Citroen C-Crosser | |
Make | Nissan | Citroen |
Model | X-Trail | C-Crosser |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2184 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 380 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |