2008 Nissan X-Trail vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (139 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2008 Nissan X-Trail. (134 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 2008 Nissan X-Trail.
Because 2008 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Holden Cruze. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Nissan X-Trail (300 Nm) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Cruze. (176 Nm). This means 2008 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Nissan X-Trail | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Nissan | Holden |
Model | X-Trail | Cruze |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2184 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 139 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 176 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2685 mm |