2008 Opel Astra vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Opel Astra is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,909 cc, 2008 Opel Astra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Opel Astra weights approximately 400 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Opel Astra (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (142 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2008 Opel Astra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Opel Astra | 1991 Renault Clio | |
Make | Opel | Renault |
Model | Astra | Clio |
Year Released | 2008 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1909 cc | 1794 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 93 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
Top Speed | 210 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1395 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.8 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 52 L | 43 L |