2008 Opel Omega vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Opel Omega would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (500 Nm) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Opel Omega. (203 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Opel Omega. 2012 Jaguar XF has automatic transmission and 2008 Opel Omega has manual transmission. 2008 Opel Omega will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Jaguar XF will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Opel Omega | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Opel | Jaguar |
Model | Omega | XF |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 237 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 500 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.5 seconds | 6.7 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.6 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 70 L |