2008 Opel Tigra vs. 2003 Opel Combo
To start off, 2008 Opel Tigra is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Opel Combo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Opel Combo would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Opel Combo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Opel Combo weights approximately 106 kg more than 2008 Opel Tigra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Opel Combo (138 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Opel Tigra. (125 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Opel Combo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Opel Tigra.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Opel Tigra | 2003 Opel Combo | |
Make | Opel | Opel |
Model | Tigra | Combo |
Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1364 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 125 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.4 seconds | 14 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1129 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.1 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 52 L |