2008 Peugeot 206 vs. 1959 Volvo 120
To start off, 2008 Peugeot 206 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,580 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Volvo 120 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Volvo 120 weights approximately 45 kg more than 2008 Peugeot 206.
Because 1959 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Peugeot 206, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Volvo 120 (118 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Peugeot 206. (111 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1959 Volvo 120 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Peugeot 206.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Peugeot 206 | 1959 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Peugeot | Volvo |
Model | 206 | 120 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1580 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 76 HP |
Torque | 111 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75.1 mm | 79.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2610 mm |