2008 Peugeot 206 vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 2008 Peugeot 206 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Peugeot 206 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 200 weights approximately 108 kg more than 2008 Peugeot 206.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Peugeot 206 (205 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (170 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Peugeot 206 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Peugeot 206 | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Peugeot | Rover |
Model | 206 | 200 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 85 HP |
Torque | 205 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1027 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2510 mm |