2008 Peugeot 307 vs. 2003 Volvo V50

To start off, 2008 Peugeot 307 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Volvo V50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Volvo V50 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo V50 weights approximately 8 kg more than 2008 Peugeot 307.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Volvo V50 (230 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Peugeot 307. (200 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Volvo V50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Peugeot 307. 2003 Volvo V50 has automatic transmission and 2008 Peugeot 307 has manual transmission. 2008 Peugeot 307 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Volvo V50 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Peugeot 307 2003 Volvo V50
Make Peugeot Volvo
Model 307 V50
Year Released 2008 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1996 cc 2435 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 161 HP
Torque 200 Nm 230 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 85 mm 83.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88 mm 90 mm
Acceleration 0-100mph 10.7 seconds 9 seconds
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1391 kg 1399 kg
Vehicle Length 4430 mm 4520 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2630 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 7.9 L/100km 9.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 62 L