2008 Peugeot 406 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Peugeot 406. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Peugeot 406 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 323 kg more than 2008 Peugeot 406.
Because 2012 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Peugeot 406, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm @ 5700 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Peugeot 406. (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 2012 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Peugeot 406.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Peugeot 406 | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Peugeot | Cadillac |
Model | 406 | CTS |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 3000 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 302 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1425 kg | 1748 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3740 mm | 4877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |