2008 Pontiac Solstice vs. 1966 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2008 Pontiac Solstice is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Pontiac Solstice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Pontiac Solstice (260 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Pontiac Solstice should accelerate faster than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Because 2008 Pontiac Solstice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Pontiac Solstice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Pontiac Solstice (353 Nm @ 5300 RPM) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Pontiac Solstice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Pontiac Solstice | 1966 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Pontiac | Riley |
Model | Solstice | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 353 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5300 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 25 L |