2008 Proton Arena vs. 1961 Simca Plein Ceil
To start off, 2008 Proton Arena is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Simca Plein Ceil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Simca Plein Ceil would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Simca Plein Ceil weights approximately 65 kg more than 2008 Proton Arena.
Because 1961 Simca Plein Ceil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Simca Plein Ceil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Proton Arena, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Proton Arena | 1961 Simca Plein Ceil | |
| Make | Proton | Simca |
| Model | Arena | Plein Ceil |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1961 |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 56 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4210 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2360 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 55 L |
