2008 Renault Clio vs. 1953 Riley RM A
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Riley RM A weights approximately 250 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Because 1953 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Renault Clio | 1953 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Renault | Riley |
| Model | Clio | RM A |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1953 |
| Engine Size | 1149 cc | 1496 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 985 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2870 mm |
