2008 Renault Clio vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 85 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Because 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Renault Clio | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | Renault | Sunbeam |
| Model | Clio | Tiger |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Roadster |
| Engine Size | 1390 cc | 4261 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 27 L |
