2008 Renault Clio vs. 1971 Rover 2000
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 2,946 cc, 2008 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Clio weights approximately 40 kg more than 1971 Rover 2000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Clio (301 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Rover 2000. (172 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2008 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Renault Clio | 1971 Rover 2000 | |
| Make | Renault | Rover |
| Model | Clio | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1971 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 2946 cc | 1978 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 106 HP |
| Torque | 301 Nm | 172 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2640 mm |
