2008 Renault Clio vs. 1972 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Renault Clio (110 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1972 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 30 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Clio (151 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2008 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Renault Clio | 1972 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Renault | Triumph |
| Model | Clio | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 151 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1215 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2700 mm |
