2008 Renault Clio vs. 1979 Zastava 750
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 2,946 cc, 2008 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Clio weights approximately 695 kg more than 1979 Zastava 750.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Clio (301 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Zastava 750. (51 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Renault Clio | 1979 Zastava 750 | |
| Make | Renault | Zastava |
| Model | Clio | 750 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1979 |
| Engine Size | 2946 cc | 766 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 30 HP |
| Torque | 301 Nm | 51 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2010 mm |
