2008 Renault Clio vs. 1981 Talbot 1510
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Talbot 1510. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Talbot 1510 would be higher. At 1,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Talbot 1510 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Talbot 1510 weights approximately 65 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Talbot 1510 (108 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1981 Talbot 1510 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Renault Clio | 1981 Talbot 1510 | |
Make | Renault | Talbot |
Model | Clio | 1510 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1149 cc | 1294 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 63 HP |
Torque | 105 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 985 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2610 mm |