2008 Renault Clio vs. 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 2,946 cc, 2008 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 519 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Because 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Clio (301 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (300 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2008 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Renault Clio | 1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Renault | Jeep |
Model | Clio | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2008 | 1997 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2946 cc | 2499 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 301 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1335 kg | 1854 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1710 mm |