2008 Renault Clio vs. 2000 Renault Megane
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Renault Megane would be higher. At 1,397 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Renault Megane weights approximately 25 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 127 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Renault Clio | 2000 Renault Megane | |
Make | Renault | Renault |
Model | Clio | Megane |
Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1397 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 70 L |