2008 Renault Clio vs. 2000 Rover 45
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Rover 45. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Rover 45 would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Rover 45 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Rover 45 weights approximately 170 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Rover 45 (163 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Rover 45 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Renault Clio | 2000 Rover 45 | |
Make | Renault | Rover |
Model | Clio | 45 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 1149 cc | 1795 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 105 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 69 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.8 mm | 89.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 985 kg | 1155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 45 L |