2008 Renault Clio vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 134 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (180 Nm @ 6800 RPM) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Renault Clio | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Clio | Celica |
Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Size | 1149 cc | 1796 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 189 HP |
Torque | 105 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 69 mm | 82.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.8 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 11.5:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.3 seconds | 7.2 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 985 kg | 1119 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 55 L |