2008 Renault Clio vs. 2002 Saturn SC
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Saturn SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Saturn SC would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Saturn SC is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Saturn SC weights approximately 15 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Saturn SC (154 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2002 Saturn SC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Renault Clio | 2002 Saturn SC | |
Make | Renault | Saturn |
Model | Clio | SC |
Year Released | 2008 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1901 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 154 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.6 mm | 82.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |