2008 Renault Clio vs. 2003 Ford F-150
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford F-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford F-150 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford F-150 weights approximately 1090 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Because 2003 Ford F-150 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford F-150 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford F-150 (338 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 233 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio. 2003 Ford F-150 has automatic transmission and 2008 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2008 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford F-150 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Renault Clio | 2003 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Renault | Ford |
Model | Clio | F-150 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Size | 1149 cc | 4195 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 202 HP |
Torque | 105 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 985 kg | 2075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3050 mm |