2008 Renault Clio vs. 2006 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Toyota RAV4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Toyota RAV4 would be higher. At 2,946 cc, 2008 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota RAV4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Clio (301 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota RAV4. (224 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota RAV4.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Renault Clio | 2006 Toyota RAV4 | |
Make | Renault | Toyota |
Model | Clio | RAV4 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 2946 cc | 2398 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 301 Nm | 224 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 88.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 96 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 60 L |