2008 Renault Clio vs. 2007 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Saturn Outlook. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Saturn Outlook would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Saturn Outlook is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Saturn Outlook (336 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2007 Saturn Outlook will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio. 2007 Saturn Outlook has automatic transmission and 2008 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2008 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Saturn Outlook will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Renault Clio | 2007 Saturn Outlook | |
Make | Renault | Saturn |
Model | Clio | Outlook |
Year Released | 2008 | 2007 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Size | 1149 cc | 3600 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
Torque | 105 Nm | 336 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 83 L |