2008 Renault Clio vs. 2010 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2010 Jeep Compass is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Compass (158 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2008 Renault Clio. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 2008 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Compass (191 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (160 Nm @ 1700 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Renault Clio | 2010 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Renault | Jeep |
Model | Clio | Compass |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1461 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1656 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 51 L |